A wallet address on its own tells you almost nothing. WalletINT starts by screening the address against sanctioned and blocklisted-wallet databases — the crypto equivalent of an OFAC check — so an obvious hit is flagged immediately. From there, it builds a transaction graph: every counterparty the wallet has sent to or received from, laid out visually so a reviewer can see fund flow patterns — a wallet that only ever transacts with one mixer-adjacent address tells a very different story than one with a broad, organic transaction history.

Wallet-to-real-world attribution comes from a Breadcrumbs integration, which surfaces known associations — exchange deposit addresses, previously flagged entities, and other identity signals — tied to addresses in the transaction graph, instead of leaving every counterparty as an anonymous string of characters. Chain support includes the plumbing needed for Tron-based assets in addition to the more commonly screened chains, since a meaningful share of real-world illicit flow moves through USDT on Tron rather than Bitcoin or Ethereum alone.

Every wallet investigation can be tagged to a case, so a screening result isn’t a one-off lookup that gets lost — it’s attached to the same case record an analyst is already building in the platform’s broader investigation tooling (including a direct bridge into the entity-graph Playground for deeper pivoting). When a finding needs to go to a compliance officer or a regulator, WalletINT exports it as a structured SAR (Suspicious Activity Report), with the blocklist hits, transaction graph, and Breadcrumbs attributions already assembled — not a screenshot, a real document built for filing.